Skip navigation

Category Archives: The Lab

THE SCARLET LETTER | photo credit Rick Pollock

THE SCARLET LETTER | photo credit Rick Pollock

The sold-out, world premiere of Jenifer Nii’s THE SCARLET LETTER closes this Sunday.  Click here for information on stand-by tickets.

But fret not – we at Plan-B have quite a bit goin’ on between now and the first weekend in August!

So here’s the skinny on a trio of must-see events!

 


 

SLAM  |  photo credit Rick Pollock

SLAM | photo credit Rick Polloc

9th ANNUAL SLAM
Saturday, May 12

SLAM is this crazy thing we do where we spend 23 highly caffeinated hours slamming out five world premiere short plays by Utah playwrights.

You spend the 24th hour with us to see the results!

SLAM also features a cash bar with finger food by Cali’s Natural Foods…and the announcement of our 2012/13 season.

Playwrights:  Matthew Ivan Bennett, Elaine Jarvik, Julie Jensen, Jenifer Nii and Eric Samuelsen.

Directors:  John Graham, Alexandra Harbold, Kyle Lewis, Kay Shean and Christy Summerhays.

Actors:  Kirt Bateman, Carleton Bluford, Dee-Dee Darby-Duffin, April Fossen, Mark Fossen, Colleen Lewis, Stephanie Howell, Deena Marie Manzanares, Tracie Merrill, Lauren Noll, Topher Rasmussen, Latoya Rhodes, Jason Tatom, Kalyn West and Claire Wilson.

 

HEDWIG AND THE ANGRY INCH  |  photo credit Greg Ragland

HEDWIG AND THE ANGRY INCH | photo credit Greg Ragland

HEDWIG AND THE ANGRY INCH
June 8-17

Sex, drag and rock ‘n’ roll.
The anatomically in-correct, glam-rock musical returns to Zion.

Plan-B’s award-winning production gets a 10th anniversary re-boot courtesy of the fine folks at Park City’s Egyptian Theatre.

Transsexual East German rocker Hedwig Schmidt, victim of a botched sex-change operation, finds herself living in a trailer park in Kansas. So…she forms a band (The Angry Inch), sharing her life story on her cross-country tour stalking her rock-star ex-boyfriend Tommy Gnosis – a quest for her other half.

And it’s a helluva lot of fun.

Hedwig: Aaron Swenson
Yitzhak:  Latoya Rhodes
The Angry Inch:  Camden Chamberlain and Van Christensen of The Suicycles with Dave Evanoff and Adam Overacker.

 

8: THE PLAY

8: THE PLAY

8: THE PLAY
August 4-5

See what happens when discrimination is put on trial in the Utah premiere of 8, a docudrama inspired by the passage of Proposition 8 and the ensuing federal case for marriage equality.

8 is the real-life story of Kris & Sandy and Paul & Jeff, two loving couples who want to get married but can’t. Together with attorneys David Boies and Ted Olson and a host of expert witnesses, they take aim at Proposition 8.

Written by Academy Award-winner Dustin Lance Black (Milk), 8 is based on the actual Perry trial transcripts, first-hand observations of the courtroom drama and interviews with the plaintiffs and their families.

As 8 flashes in and out of the Perry court, watch both sides present the best evidence, arguments and witnesses for and against marriage for gay and lesbian Americans. See how the case affects the plaintiffs and their kids, and, following the performance, learn how you too can become involved in the fight for equal rights.

8 is a celebration of Plan-B’s commitment to unique and socially conscious theatre, 25% of ticket sales will benefit the American Foundation for Equal Rights; the balance will help fund Plan-B’s 2012/13 season.

Actors:  Tobin Atkinson, Kirt Bateman, Matthew Ivan Bennett, Anita Booher, Jason Bowcutt, Reed Cowan (director of the documentary film 8: THE MORMON PROPOSITION), April Fossen, Mark Fossen, Jonathan Scott McBride, Jay Perry, Topher Rasmussen, Teresa Sanderson, Aaron Swenson, Logan Tarantino, Jason Tatom and Sarah Young.

 

Please visit our website for details on and tickets to all events (except THE LAB RECITAL – it’s full)!

Carleton Bluford as Wallace Thurman in Plan-B's WALLACE - photo credit Rick Pollock

Carleton Bluford as Wallace Thurman in Plan-B's WALLACE - photo credit Rick Pollock

Writing. I’ve spent so much time learning and fighting and rebelling and questioning what I’m doing. I’ve spent my time trying, not only to become a playwright, but a good one. I’ve focused all of my attention on trying to produce some amazing work that no one can refute. Something so genius that they would, not only produce my work, but would salute Tobin Atkinson for teaching such an enlightened pupil. I have learned since that this is a young man’s error, a futile attempt. Writing is a much more delicate endeavor than that and those who are great at it are for critiques to decide.

This last project I’ve been working on is like nothing I’ve written, I’m not sure if it’s any good. What I’m the most afraid of is that people will hear it and wonder if I learned anything from The Lab at all. With all of these doubts bouncing around in my head it’s hard, but at least I fear no more. What I’ve learned is that sometimes failure paves the way to success and in most cases, for the very young, is a necessity. The main ingredient for the recipe of a well-known playwright.  So you might say that after two years under Tobin, I’ve gone from being store-bought cookie dough to being laid out and placed in the oven. No, I don’t think that the center is done yet and I’m sure that that is precisely what you will see come time to hear what I have produced for the class.

It has been a pleasure and an honor to participate and work with the bright and informative people in The Lab, I couldn’t have asked for better training. And with my final project due shortly and rehearsals beginning in mid-February for my next acting gig – Plan-B’s THE THIRD CROSSING – right around the corner, I must prepare my mind for another journey. Which is precisely what this class has been, a journey. Over the past two years my life has changed entirely and so has my writing. Twisting and turning, I’ve been unraveling, leaving my old self behind and changing into a butterfly. Poetic, I just hope my writing does the same. If this workshop has taught me anything, it’s that to do anything, you have to keep trying and keep showing up. I intend to do just that await the critique of my play with baited breath.

It may sound a bit like something is over, like things are coming to an end and that’s because something is. The end of the workshop, the end of the old me, the end of many things. Endings are natural in life as they are in plays. However, I believe that things only end so that something else can begin and for that, I truly cannot wait.

While a member of the Plan-B/Meat & Potato Lab, Carleton Bluford’s short play BREATHE was read as part of the HIV/AIDS Plays as part of Plan-B’s Script-In-Hand Series in partnership with the Utah AIDS Foundation.  He, along with the five other playwrights and two directors in The Lab will showcase their work at the Lab Recital on April 18 as part of Plan-B’s Script-In-Hand Series.  Click here for info and free tickets.  Click here for more information on and tickets to THE THIRD CROSSING.

Beth Bruner

Beth Bruner

Serendipity can play such a part in life.  In May of 2010 I had an old script revived, and a husband start nagging.  It had been three years since I’d written as much as a monologue, seven since I’d produced a full script, decades since I had really committed myself to writing a “serious play.”  He flatteringly felt that was a loss.  Less than a month later, Plan-B/Meat & Potato put out a call for applications to their second playwright’s lab.

I told Tobin at the interview that my main goal was to get writing again.

Almost two years later, I’ve had one (non-serious) script produced, a serious short-short in Wasatch Theatre’s Page-To-Stage Festival, and had the honor of being invited to write for Student SLAM (an incredible experience I hope to have the luck to repeat often).  And I am putting the finishing touches on my one-act submission for this year’s Lab Recital.

Goal accomplished. Discoveries made.

I’ve discovered that firm deadlines are necessary for me, and I shall have to figure out some way to keep creating them once class due dates become a thing of the past.

I’ve discovered that friends can be so generous with their time and analysis.

I’ve discovered my husband is still my best critic (“Why are they all speaking in tweets?”, and my son knows me very well (“Mom, write about something you’ll need to research, you know that always keeps you interested.”)

I’ve discovered the half-hour between breakfast and work can be incredibly productive, as can time in the shower.

And I’ve discovered a wonderful group of writers I hope I can keep in touch with as the years go on, for their insight and creativity.

Thank you universe for sending this wonderful opportunity my way—and thank you Tobin and Jerry for making it so rewarding.

Beth Bruner, the five other playwrights and two directors in The Lab will showcase their work at the Lab Recital on April 18 as part of Plan-B’s Script-In-Hand Series.  Click here for info and free tickets.

Jim Martin

Jim Martin

Lately, I’ve begun to feel some regret.  Regret that my experience as a playwright with the Plan B/Meat and Potato Lab will soon come to a close and that I’m not “finished.”  Actually, I’ve been feeling this regret since the beginning of our second year in the Lab.  It’s a nagging regret.  It won’t go away, no matter how much I try.

You see, I haven’t “finished” or completed all the learning that I desire.  I haven’t been able to write my playwriting masterpiece yet.  I haven’t begun to figure out how I discipline myself to keep on writing outside of the lab, without an intense instructor prompting me along the way.  I haven’t figured out how to live as a playwright yet…

And maybe this is impossible.  Maybe that’s the source of my regret.  The fact that I work full-time and can’t devote the kind of time to my writing that I wish.  Maybe I won

’t ever live as a playwright but just flirt with a playwright’s lifestyle from time to time.

Or perhaps this is an excuse.  Perhaps if I truly prioritized my writing, I’d replace it with some of my television or friend time.  I’d put it on my schedule like I put waking up, brushing my teeth, taking a shower, going to work, and eating dinner.

Whatever the source, I feel regret.  I’ve enjoyed my experience in the lab so much that I fear letting it go.  I worry about where I’ll be as a playwright without it.  It reminds me somewhat of a parent-child relationship—when is the best time to let go?  This particular letting go is a forced one.  I’m not ready.  And yet, I hope that I’ve created strong enough bonds with playwriting colleagues that we can continue to support one another, even beyond the formal lab.

I know for a fact that I wouldn’t have felt this same way two years ago, before the lab.  Then, playwriting was about making a point.  It was a way for me to make some grandiose statement and to force people to listen to this perspective.  You can’t walk out of a play in the middle the same way you can walk away from an argument, right?  I could always get the upper-hand in playwriting.  So there!

But now, I’ve come to a new realization.  Playwriting is a place where we, as artisans, search for meaning.  Where we try to sort out matters that are challenging or confusing—ones that don’t necessarily have easy straightforward answers.  Playwriting is about figuring things out.  It’s become a required part of my sensemaking.  When I read a newspaper article or hear a news story that challenges me, I think of writing a play.  When I hear a word that intrigues me, I think of writing a play.  When I struggle with a part of myself that I don’t understand, I think of writing a play.

This is what the lab has meant to me.  It’s been more significant than one might imagine.  And now, I’ve got to wrestle with the regret and find a way to satisfy this internal nag.  To give outlet to a process that’s become so much more than proving that I’m right.  To feed my soul (no matter how cliché that might sound).

I’m honored to have had the opportunity to participate in the Lab.  It’s given me an incredible gift in playwriting.  Now my challenge is to figure out how to continue independently of the lab.  I hope it’s clear from this entry that writing has become part of my identity—part of my continuous search to understand who I am and what defines me.  Maybe before the lab, I would have said I knew the answer to this identity question.  Now, thanks to playwriting, there are and will continue to be more questions than answers.

While a member of the Plan-B/Meat & Potato Lab, Jim Martin has written for Student SLAM in partnership with Theatre Arts Conservatory and his short play DEFENESTRATED was read as part of the HIV/AIDS Plays as part of Plan-B’s Script-In-Hand Series in partnership with the Utah AIDS Foundation.

Christopher Glade in Plan-B's HEDWIG AND THE ANGRY INCH (2003 and 2005)

Let me open by expressing my gratitude. The Plan-B/Meat & Potato Lab found me at the exact right time. I had been involved, even making what passes for a living, in the Salt Lake theatre scene for the better part of ten years. In that time I had worked for many of the professional and semi-professional companies, joined Actors’ Equity, usually maintained my insurance weeks, and had started to branch out into directing. Looking back, I am proud of the work. Somewhere along the line, however, I lost focus. A life in the theatre, the goal from way back (too far back) in the undergrad days, had become a job.

I’ve always seen the theatre as part of the service profession, taking the view that actors are more like plumbers and carpenters, than painters and composers. The idea that the stage is the most blue collar of the arts appealed to me. But my perspective had slipped into doing what I had to in order to keep the mortgage company from calling. I had lost the feeling of true discovery. Please don’t misunderstand, I am more that grateful for every opportunity I was given. I don’t believe it went so far as phoning anything in. I worked hard to do good work. But I was doing it for the wrong reasons.

The Lab has shaken that up. It started doing so in the most obvious way. We went back to basics. Script analysis, story, character. All the bones from college. I was able to look at the form with a clean eye and what a play meant and what it meant to put up a play. Which brings me to my point, I suppose.

The only reason to go to the enormous trouble of mounting any production is that you have a burning need to share this story with an audience. It’s not about finally getting to play that dream role or direct that dream play. It’s not about getting a paycheck that will actually pay your bills. It’s not about the emotional experience of the people involved. These are not bad things, but they are not important enough. The only thing important enough is that you, as an artist, feel that the story you have to tell is necessary, that the telling is required. That it is so important that you can ask strangers to exchange two hours and a sum of money for the lies you tell in the dark. You must honor that contract with something that is worth the exchange.  You have to tell people a truth that can change lives if all involved allow for the opportunity.

So thank you Lab, for helping me find my faith and renew my calling.  I look forward to being able to share my discoveries in the work moving forward.

Now would someone give me a job?

Christopher Glade will be directing for Student SLAM on January 7 - a partnership between Plan-B Theatre and the Theatre Arts Conservatory, where 25 student actors (from a dozen area middle schools and high schools), five playwrights, five directors and five designers create five short plays in 23 hours. The audience joins in the fun for the 24th hour to see the results!  Student SLAM also features Lab members Beth Bruner and Jim Martin (playwrights) and Nathaniel Hinckley (director).

Nathaniel Hinckley

Nathaniel Hinckley

Some things are probably always going to be true of the way we tell stories. One of my more recent additions to this category comes from my participation in the Plan-B/Meat & Potato Lab as a director: the hero’s journey. A flawed but seemingly ordinary person receives a call to adventure, refuses it, consults a (supernatural) mentor, accepts it, encounters tests, gains allies, makes enemies… and so on for a few more acts. It’s a great model. Luke Skywalker does it. Liz Lemon does it. Spongebob Squarepants does it. Now that I know about it, I see it everywhere. There are, I believe, a lot of similar structures – Polti’s 36 Dramatic Situations is a more complex example.

Some things about the way we tell stories may not have the same staying power. Ursula Le Guin said it best: “Conflict is one kind of behavior. There are others.” I don’t think we need to keep our characters constantly fighting to keep a play constantly moving. If you want to argue that the obstacles preventing two characters from admitting they are in love with each other is a form of conflict, then sure, there’s probably conflict everywhere in drama. With that much determination and a definition that broad, you can find anything.

A host of new methods of storytelling are springing onto the playing field. Like the internet, immersive theatre places the audience ambulatory amidst the action, free to wander and decide what to look at (generally in a larger or more unique location). Like video games, participatory theatre involves the audience as impromptu players (such as the murder mystery theatre of the 40s and 50s). And solo audience member theatre takes them in one by one, perhaps to play out a “short film” while they sit alone in a booth and watch the “screen” – or perhaps they play your best friend and make decisions that shape the world of the story as it happens.

Out with the old, in with the new, everything changes but this is still true – I want compelling stories. It’s easier for my simple brain to follow if you keep it down to approximately one protagonist who’s got a pretty clear goal. Constant fighting isn’t necessary. Remember that plot models belie the complexity and nuance of life, your muse. But they’re useful tools. Does theatre have to find a new name if it isn’t happening in theatres?

As part of his participation in The Lab, Nathaniel recently directed for Student SLAM and will direct for the Lab Recital on April 18 as part of Plan-B’s Script-In-Hand Series.

Mark Fossen as Christopher Columbus - photo credit Rick Pollock

Mark Fossen as Christopher Columbus - photo credit Rick Pollock

Mark Fossen has appeared in Plan-B’s THE ALIENATION EFFEKT, EXPOSED and AMERIGO as well as AND THE BANNED PLAYED ON, many a SLAM and participated in the Plan-B/Meat & Potato Directors’ Lab.

If you know me only from my Plan-B roles, there’s a good chance you don’t like me. “Sympathetic,” “warm,” “relatable” … these aren’t really the words you’d use to describe a lot of the work I do. Let’s face it: I often play The Man. From a religious politician who campaigns against gay clubs, to a government official who looks the other way as nuclear testing poisons his own people, to a man arguably responsible for genocide. These aren’t even “bad guys with hearts of gold,” because there’s no heart of gold. These are forces of oppression on the wrong side of history.

As awful as they are, I do love the challenge of these characters. I’m still inspired by the work I saw Jayne Luke do in FACING EAST when I was just starting my first Plan-B show, THE ALIENATION AFFEKT. She fully inhabited Ruth McCormick, when it could have been all too easy to stand to the side and make sure we knew that the actress and character were different people with different views. But the important thing with roles like these is to get inside and understand that they are always doing what they think is right.

Certainly Christopher Columbus in Eric Samuelsen’s AMERIGO was the high point of these roles, and the perfect example: a man utterly driven by beliefs that seem alien, evil, and wrong. I don’t ever want to become an apologist, but I knew that I had to put myself in his 15th Century shoes. If I was the first to discover a new world, a new society and was going to shape the relations between our people for all time: what are my unquestioned prejudices for which posterity would damn me?

For a time, it was physically affecting to carry that weight around with me. To carry the kind of righteousness that could cause an extermination of a hemisphere. The weight of history took physical form, not lessened by the fact that I think Columbus was conscious of it and welcomed it: I think that he’d be satisfied by a new world actor playing him hundreds of years later. He fully expected to be judged by the future – though I think he expected his judgment to be better.

It’s tempting to demonize men like Columbus – to say that the forces aligned against us are inhuman or “evil,” but it’s far more difficult to realize they are so often people who see the world differently, but are honestly trying to do what they think is right. We don’t have to agree, but we shouldn’t so easily dismiss. And I believe only when we realize this can true dialogue begin.

Learn more about our upcoming 2011/12 season here!